Cases 1 - 10 of 42
(PC) Brown v. Wright et al
as 2:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
Steven K. Brown
Defendant:
Wright, Mule Creek State Prison and California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Burla
as 3:2023cv03539
Plaintiff:
Travis K. Brown
Defendant:
E. Burla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Meneese v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Jamar Meneese
Defendant:
Rick Hill, Ralph Diaz, K. Michels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Berumen v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Daniel Berumen
Defendant:
T. Jones, L. Carrasco, M. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Johnson v. A. Meyer, et al
as 22-16160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JAMAUL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MEYER, Lt., A. MEDEN, Correctional Officer II, J. MARTINES, Correctional Officer II and others
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 5:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv04676
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Autrey v. 3M et al
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Autrey
Defendant:
3M, Fairchild Air Force Base, Tyco Fire Products and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. 3M et al
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Chavez
Defendant:
3M, Tyco Fire Products, Fair Child Airforce Base and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. 3M et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Wilkins
Defendant:
3M, Fair Child Airforce Base, Tyco Fire Products and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
