Cases 1 - 10 of 7,920
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Defendant:
J. Ybarra, C.O. Lay, K. Hofman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mackey v. Rudd, et al.
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Terry Mackey
Defendant:
Rudd, K. Ram, Sgt. Mix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernando Miguel De Oliveira v. CDCR-California Institution for Women et al
as 5:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Fernando Miquel De Oliveira
Defendant:
CDCR-California Institution for Women, L. Parker, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ng v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Benjamin K Ng
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Case v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
David K. Case
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Chris Shupe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedric Garnett Johnson v. Travis Pennington et al
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Pennington, D. Mortimer, D. Tristan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bibbs v. Melton et al
as 3:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
K. Melton, D. Moyer, V. Lizaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Diaz v. Botmi et al
as 2:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Jesus Diaz
Defendant:
K. Botmi and C. Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Winmill et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
B Lynn Winmill, Amanda K. Brailsford and David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
