Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Lucero Jr. v. Blaney
as 5:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Albert Benjamin Lucero Jr.
Defendant:
John Blaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bevins #267562 v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv08061
Plaintiff:
Ryan September Wednesday Bevins
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Amy Lucero, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lucero v. Richards
as 2:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
Ramisha Slocum Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucero v. The People
as 2:2023cv02852
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Lucero v. State of California
as 2:2023cv02844
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viera v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Lorenzita Lucero Viera
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amador Lucero v. David Shinn
as 23-15666
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMADOR REYNEL LUCERO
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director
Lawson v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
