Cases 1 - 10 of 10
The Estate of Michael Lee Alexander, Jr. (Anthony Gallagher, Personal Representative) v. Slaughter et al
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Michael Lee Alexander, Jr. (Anthony Gallagher, Personal Representative)
Defendant:
Jesse Slaughter, Cascade County and John Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
Tyler Nicodemus, Matthew Lee Alexander and Terry Rasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Pizer et al
as 2:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
John Pizer and Prison Legal Aid Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillman v. Beauchamp et al
as 2:2016cv00972
Plaintiff:
Robert Dillman
Defendant:
B Beauchamp, J Alan Shepard, Christine Duarte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Beauchamp et al
as 2:2016cv00870
Plaintiff:
Joe Green
Defendant:
B Beauchamp, J Alan Shepard, Christine Duarte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Knucles et al
as 4:2013cv04228
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Kristi N Knucles, R. Parin, M. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Alexander v. USA, et al
as 13-15024
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Alexander v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01312
Petitioner:
David Lee Alexander
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Alexander v. F. Haw
as 10-55321
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
F. B. HAWS
Alexander v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv00483
Plaintiff:
David Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Peterson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
