Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Willis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, County of Multnomah, City of Portland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv01836
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon State Bar, Judge Steffan Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Penney et al
as 4:2020cv08024
Defendant:
Jake Chatters, M. Anderson, D. Honda and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Payton v. Anderson et al
as 2:2019cv00426
Plaintiff:
Norbert Maurice Payton
Defendant:
Marcellina Perry, Nathan M. Anderson and Whitney Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Eldon K McDaniel, Rusti Donnelly, V. Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Anderson v. NDOC, et al
as 18-15263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, QUENTIN BYRNE, VALAREE OLIVAS and others
Rodriguez #242516 v. Ibarra et al
as 2:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Staci Ibarra, M Anderson, Unknown Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leroy Wells v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 16-35917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, ANNA M. JOYCE, BENJAMIN N. GUTMAN and others
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
