Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kelly
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department, Gina M Lumia, Guy Marchal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kelly
Defendant:
Sean P Gallagher, Alex P Jansen, Edward C Curtain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Mark William Collins
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Collins v. James Salmonsen, et al
as 22-35870
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM COLLINS
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES SALMONSEN and AUSTIN KNUDSEN
Collins v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Mark William Collins
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clary v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv00205
Petitioner:
Mark William Clary, Jr.
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bryant v. Kibler et al
as 2:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Robert Peery, Crother, Brian Kibler and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bryant v. Kibler et al
as 1:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Robert Peery, Crother, Brian Kibler and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cappello v. Cisneros
as 3:2020cv08287
Petitioner:
Mark William Cappello
Respondent:
Teresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield et al
as 2:2019cv10449
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru, Diallo Earl Uhuru and Diallo Dynomite
Defendant:
J. Steck, D. Samuel, John Farao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
