Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Lewis v. John Doe 1, Warden San Quentin State Prison et al
as 5:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Terence Lewis
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Warden San Quentin State Prison, Jane Doe 1, Captin, West Block, San Quentin State Prison and John Doe 2, Rand R Sergant- San Quentin State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows v. Ford et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Aaron Ford and Douglas Rands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rand v. USA
as 3:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Robert Gene Rand
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rand Codon v. Brad Cain
as 23-35290
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAND MAURICE CODON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN
Rice v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
John Valda Rice
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Melissa Andrewjeski, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice et al v. Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05162
Plaintiff:
John Valda Rice
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Melissa Andrewjeski, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkes v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Parkes
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Douglas Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Gene Rand v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv02146
Petitioner:
Robert Rand
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robert Gene Rand v. Warden Birkholz
as 2:2022cv01818
Petitioner:
Robert Gene Rand
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sales v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Defendant:
Erin L. Albright, Tara Carpenter, Del Porto and others
Plaintiff:
Neal Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
