Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Schmitt v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Jacob Ivan Schmitt
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lee Beitman v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, et al
as 22-15716
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEE MICHAEL BEITMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Contracted Healthcare Provider at ASPC Kingman/Huachuca Unit, previously named Correct Clear Solutions, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Contracted Health Care Provider at ADOC, MARTIN GRUENBERG and others
Schmitt v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2021cv01693
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schmitt and Jacob I Schmitt
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington Department of Corrections, Victoria Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrich v. Bales et al
as 2:2018cv03004
Plaintiff:
Devin Andrich
Defendant:
April Landry, Robert E Schmitt, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmitt v. Obenland
as 3:2018cv05602
Petitioner:
Jacob Ivan Schmitt
Respondent:
Mike Obenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schmitt v. Warden et al
as 1:2017cv00829
Plaintiff:
Michael Schmitt
Defendant:
Warden, Appeal Coordinator and R & R Sergeant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stribling v. Costa et al
as 2:2017cv01243
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
Costa and Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmitt v. Warden et al
as 3:2017cv01056
Plaintiff:
Michael Schmitt
Defendant:
Warden, Appeal Coordinator and R & R Sergeant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmitt v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 3:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
Michael Schmitt
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and Walker,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claim Act - Personal Injury
Schmitt v. Gore et al
as 3:2017cv00753
Plaintiff:
Michael Schmitt
Defendant:
Bill Gore, Santee Sheriff Dept and Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
