Cases 1 - 10 of 14,846
(PC) Carey v. Keeton et al
as 2:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Carey
Defendant:
D. Keeton and Jeff Dirkse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Parra et al
as 4:2024cv03598
Plaintiff:
Stanford Paul Bryant
Defendant:
J. Parra, J. Patricio, Correctional Officer D. Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03552
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Carr v. Cueva et al
as 2:2024cv01680
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Carr
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva and Cody Dail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge, Bubba Fudge and Bubba
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katchatag v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Jeremy Hough, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner:
Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McKinsey-Pace v. Douglas County Sheriff Office
as 6:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luddy v. Dzurenda
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred D. Luddy
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Kenneth Williams, J. Benson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
