Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 66
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 39145 Checkerbloom Lane, Shaver Lake, California, Fresno County, APN: 130-45-503 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00349
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Located at 39145 Checkerbloom Lane, Shaver Lake, California, Fresno County, APN: 130-45-503, Including All Improvements and Appurtances Thereto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Six(6) Real Properties, Located in Orange County, CA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01085
Defendant: 16142 Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana, California 92708, 16491 Peale Lane, Huntington Beach, California 92649, 16667 Bolero Lane, Huntington Beach, California 92649 and others
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 7962 N Paseo Del Norte, Tucson, AZ et al
as 4:2014cv02014
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 7962 N Paseo Del Norte, Tucson, AZ, 1507 E Prospect Lane, Tucson, AZ, 1411 E Prospect Ln., Tucson, AZ and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 9144 Burnett Road SE, Yelm, Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv05231
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Located at 9144 Burnett Road, SE, Yelm, Washington , Real Property Located at 16621 Deer Ridge Lane, SE, Yelm, Washington, Real Property Located at 16549 Vail Road SE, Yelm, Washington and others
Claimant: James Capezio , Jon Diluzio , Isabelle Diluzio and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. $156,960 In United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05139
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $156,960 In United States Currency, $16,862.15 in funds seized from US Bank, $8,698.51 in funds seized from Chase Bank and others
Claimant: Scot Raymond Combs
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-56823
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant: OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55556
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee: LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55555
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee: LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at, AKA Seal A
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 12-56934
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AKA Seal A
Claimant - Appellant: OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at, AKA Seal A
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56922
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AKA Seal A
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee: LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at, AKA Seal A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?