Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Violet Marquez et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2020cv00693
Plaintiff:
Chanteil Guy, Longina Shaw and Violet Marquez
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a legal subdivision of the State of California,, County of San Bernardino and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shaw v. City of Bremerton
as 3:2020cv05196
Plaintiff:
Frank Shaw
Defendant:
City of Bremerton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Aguilar et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael Coffaro, Daniel Buck, Katherine Pearson and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. City of Bremerton Police Department
as 3:2019cv05640
Defendant:
City of Bremerton Police Department
Plaintiff:
Frank Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thondukolam et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03857
Defendant:
Ronald C Edmonds, Jeff M Fettig, DowDuPont, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David L Everett, William C Mallonee, Krishnan R Thondukolam and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Smith v. Integrow Malt LLC et al
as 9:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Cargill Inc, Alredo Avila, Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rex Kay Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2017cv00999
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Marci G. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Shaw v. Terex Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Katrina K Shaw
Defendant:
Terex Corporation, Telex Corporation Health and Welfare Benefits Plan and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Alexander Acosta v. Jona Romualdez et al
as 5:2017cv02904
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Jona Romualdez, Serapia Beltran, Evelyn Fojas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
