Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Murphy et al v. Prestige Care, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00467
Defendant:
CHP Tualatin-Riverwood OR Tenant Corp, Prestige Care, Inc. and Prestige Senior Living, LLC
Unknown:
Jason R. Poss, Jason R. Poss and Jason R. Poss
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Morris, Elsbeth Murphy, Jon Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pera et al v. Saw Entertainment Ltd.
as 3:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Elana Pera and Sarah Murphy
Defendant:
Saw Entertainment Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Board of Trustees of the Southern California Local 831 Employer Health Fund et al v. Show Ready LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08627
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Employer Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of the Employer Training and Re-Training Fund and Board of Trustees of the Southern California Local 831 Employer Health Fund
Defendant:
Does, Douglas Murphy and Show Ready LLC
Murphy v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv03960
Plaintiff:
Susan Murphy
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Carney
as 3:2015cv04323
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Wilbert Theodis Carney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Murphy v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
as 5:2015cv03799
Plaintiff:
Beri Murphy
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Davidson Plastering, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02386
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Davidson Plastering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Hinds Bros. Company, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02387
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Trustee:
Chester Murphy
Defendant:
Hinds Bros. Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Board Of Trustees Of The Northern California Plasterers Joint Apprenticeship And Training Trust Fund
as 3:2015cv00788
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Board Of Trustees Of The Northern California Plasterers Joint Apprenticeship And Training Trust Fund
Trustee:
Chester Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 E.R.I.S.A. Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. K.V.F., Inc.
as 3:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Trustee:
Chester Murphy
Defendant:
K.V.F., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
