Cases 91 - 100 of 296
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00401
Defendant:
Unknown Karlan, Barbara Blanckensee, A Gallion and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cota v. Cardenas et al
as 2:2019cv04899
Plaintiff:
Albert Chino Cota
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections and Jason Alexander Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gemma v. Shartle et al
as 4:2019cv00382
Defendant:
R Villalva, Unknown Smythe, Unknown Madrid and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D Gemma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cota v. Cardenas et al
as 2:2019cv04727
Plaintiff:
Albert Chino Cota
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections and Jason Alexander Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wild v. Preventive Pest Control Mesa LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04500
Defendant:
Preventive Pest Control Phoenix LLC, Unknown Parties and Preventive Pest Control Mesa LLC
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild and Alexander Wild an individual doing business as Alex Wild Photography
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Alexander v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03857
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Sharon Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernandez v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03875
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Alexander Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doughty v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03624
Plaintiff:
Alexander Doughty
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Celaya v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv03477
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Alexander Paul Celaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
