Cases 91 - 100 of 123
Troutman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Plaintiff:
David Troutman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Charles L Ryan , Unknown Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gomez v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
Lino Zepeda Gomez
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation , Michael L. Benov , Lauri Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alverson v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv08116
Plaintiff:
Robert Darnell Alverson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Management & Training Corporation, Unknown Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv08068
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ray Bailey
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation, Jerry Sternes, Darla Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haas v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02043
Plaintiff:
Vivian Haas
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and Claudia Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward Parks v. Management Training Corporatio
as 10-72877
Petitioner:
EDWARD FAYE PARKS
Respondent:
MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION
Edward Parks v. Shane Jensen, et al
as 10-16586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FAYE PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANE JENSEN, Management Training Fac. and PHYSICIANS NETWORK ASSOCIATION
Han v. Adler et al
as 1:2010cv01276
Petitioner:
Chul Kyoon Han
Respondent:
Neil H. Adler and Management & Training Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cary, Sr. v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv00887
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Cary, Sr.
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , Neil H. Adler , Theodore Farias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
