Cases 91 - 100 of 289
NRDC v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 17-70817
Petitioner:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Respondent:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Los Angeles Waterkeeper, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 17-70570
Petitioner:
LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and AMERICAN RIVERS
Respondent:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ALEXIS STRAUSS, in her official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for Region IX of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Gina McCarthy et al
as 4:2016cv02184
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council , Bay.org and Defenders of Wildlife
Defendant:
Gina McCarthy and Jared Blumenfeld
Intervenor_dft:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Western Organization of Resource Councils et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Western Organization of Resource Councils , Montana Environmental Information Center , Powder River Basin Resource Council and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Sally Jewell, Neil Kornze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
CTIA - The Wireless Ass'n v. City of Berkeley, et al
as 16-15141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BERKELEY, California and CHRISTINE DANIEL, City Manager of Berkeley, California, in her official capacity
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL ADVERTISERS, INC., NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA
WildEarth Guardians v. USDA-APHIS
as 13-16071
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OREGON ECOSYSTEMS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER, FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, MARK E. SMITH FOUNDATION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, BOULDER-WHITE CLOUDS COUNCIL, CONSERVATION CONGRESS, CASCADIA WILDLANDS, IN DEFENS, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, TRAILSAVE NEVADA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
NRDC v. USEPA
as 15-72308
Petitioner:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Mineral County, et al v. Walker River Irrigation Dist., et al
as 15-16342
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINERAL COUNTY
Defendant - Appellant:
WALKER LAKE WORKING GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, CIRCLE BAR N RANCH, LLC, c/o Tom Reviglio and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and others
State of North Dakota, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 15-15894
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF ARIZONA, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Energy and Environment Cabinet and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and REGINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
STATES OF NEBRASKA, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, IDAHO, INDIANA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MICHIGAN, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN AND WYOMING.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI
Alaska Wilderness League et al v. Jewell et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Alaska Wilderness League , Center for Biological Diversity , Greenpeace Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sally Jewell and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor_defendant:
Alaska Oil and Gas Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
