Cases 91 - 100 of 170
Perez v. Arizona CLA LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00461
Plaintiff:
Perez and Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Arizona CLA LLC, Arizona Tract LLC, Arizona Superstition Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2015cv01026
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Tanweer Ahmed and National Consolidated Couriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Papa Chano's LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00813
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Papa Chano's LLC, Everardo Valle and Sergio Valle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez et al v. Lawless
as 1:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lawless Donald, Lawless Roofing, Inc. and Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Lewis Lawless
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Perez v. Lawless et al
as 1:2015cv00160
Defendant:
Donald Lawless, Lewis Lawless and Lawless Roofing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Perez
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 1221
Thomas E Perez v. G&H Technology, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan et al
as 2:2015cv00391
Defendant:
G&H Technology, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, Procyon Technologies, Inc., Lee Schuh and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
Perez v. Farol et al
as 3:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Troy Farol, Leilani Farol and Caesaran Ares
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Bar-K, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05549
Defendant:
Bar-K, Inc. and Bar-K 401(k) Plan
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
