Cases 101 - 110 of 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Laura Mirfin v. Bank of America NA et al
as 2:2012cv05583
Not Classified By Court:
Joshua E Moyer, David C Scott and Joseph Vincent Quattrocchi, Jr
Defendant:
Home Loan Center Inc, All Persons or Entities Claiming, Bank of America NA and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Mirfin
Moyer v. Miller
as 2:2012cv01170
Petitioner:
Paula R. Moyer
Respondent:
Walter Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moyer v. Miller
as 3:2012cv01907
Petitioner:
Paula R. Moyer
Respondent:
Walter Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hazelwood et al v. A.W.Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2012cv01313
Plaintiff:
Moyer Hazelwood and Sue Hazelwood
Defendant:
A.W.Chesterton Company, Pneumo Abex LLC and Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hazelwood et al v. A.W.Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2012cv01313
Plaintiff:
Moyer Hazelwood and Sue Hazelwood
Defendant:
A.W.Chesterton Company and Pneumo Abex LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moyers v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00173
Petitioner:
Carlos Moyers
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott Njos v. USDC-CARIV
as 12-70746
:
In re: SCOTT NJOS
Petitioner:
SCOTT NJOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
J.L. NORWOOD, HODAK, BOURNE and others
House v. Stoner et al
as 3:2012cv05093
Plaintiff:
Lonnie House
Defendant:
Stoner, Esther Rogers, Nancy Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxim I Properties v. Krohn et al
as 5:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Maxim l Properties
Defendant:
A.M. Bud Krohn, Ultra-Chem International, Inc, Moyer Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
