Cases 101 - 110 of 90,222
Baltierra-Quezada #236570 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Antonio Baltierra-Quezada
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Unknown Vargas, Unknown Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarango v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jesus A Tarango
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Buckeye, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Patricia Haynes
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunlap #124173 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Defendant:
Siji Thomas and Naphcare Incoporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marceaux v. Maricopa, County of
as 2:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Cammie L Marceaux
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Austin #362933 v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Elijah James Austin
Defendant:
Pima County Jail, Unknown Reyes and Unknown Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Galvin
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Christopher E Galvin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
In Re: $70,764 in United States Currency
as 4:2024mc00011
Not Yet Classified:
$70,764 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
