Cases 111 - 120 of 1,533
Garred Norman v. The White House, et al
as 22-16519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRED F. NORMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE WHITE HOUSE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President and others
Perri v. Burns et al
as 3:2022cv05739
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Perri, Apollo and Son
Defendant:
William Burns, John W Raymond, Bill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2022cv05423
Plaintiff:
Kieran Burns
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Burns v. Sikia et al
as 3:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
Kiara Demario Burns
Defendant:
Piankhi Sikia, Danielle L. Jones and PPB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. The White House et al
as 3:2022cv05154
Plaintiff:
Garred F. Norman
Defendant:
The White House, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(PC) Fields v. Sanchez, et al.
as 1:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
Devonte Fields
Defendant:
J Sanchez, J. Flores and J. Burnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boston Retirement System, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-80076
Respondent:
BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DAVID MESSINGER, ELLIE MARIE TORONTO ESA and others
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, NELSON CHAI and others
Foster v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022at00574
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tyrone Foster
Defendant:
J Burnes and T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Foster v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tyrone Foster
Defendant:
J Burnes and T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Abaray et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022cv05054
Plaintiff:
George Abaray, Juan Adame, Jerry Adcox and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
