Cases 111 - 120 of 423
Charles Henry Pittman v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs General Counsel et al
as 8:2017cv00358
Defendant:
Dr. Buckley, Department of Veterans' Affairs General Counsel, Dr. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Pittman
Maksoud v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Charbel Maksoud
Defendant:
Bruce Hopkins, Schrell Hopkins, Philippe Guelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morris Bickley, et al v. Schneider National Carriers, I
as 16-17145
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MORRIS BICKLEY, MICHAEL D. PATTON, RAYMOND GREWE and others
Appellant:
RANDALL PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., a Nevada corporation
Christopher Lancaster v. Gabby Williams et al
as 5:2017cv00013
Defendant:
Abrams, Dr. Abrams, Acting Warden Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Lancaster v. Ives et al
as 3:2016cv03129
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
Richard B. Ives, Acting Warden Unknown Associate, Warden Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Judith E. Owens et al v. Debra Hurst et al
as 5:2016cv02540
Defendant:
Elena Maria Boeva, Kelley Jean Bustos, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Drew McMaster, Shelly McMaster and Judith E Owens
Morris Bickley, et al v. Schneider National Carriers, I
as 16-17145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MORRIS BICKLEY, MICHAEL D. PATTON, RAYMOND GREWE and others
Objector - Appellant:
RANDALL PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., a Nevada corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
