Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 246
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Balboa Capital Corporation v. Mitt Lary Family Practice, LLC
as 8:2023cv00936
Plaintiff: BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION, a California Corporation and Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant: MALIKA ARYANPURE, MITT LARY FAMILY PRACTICE, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Estate of Chris Rogers v. Naphcare, Inc.
as 23-35316
Plaintiff / Appellant: ESTATE OF CHRIS ROGERS, by and through personal representative Steven Rogers
Defendant / Appellee: NAPHCARE, INC., an Alabama corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00673
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Wondany v. NRTC Alabama, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01325
Plaintiff: Anna Marie Viduya Wondany
Defendant: NRTC Alabama, Inc., Michael Vagi and Edward Cepuran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Calhoun County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff: Calhoun County, Alabama, Clay County, Alabama, Talladega County, Alabama and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff: Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Baldwin County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00278
Plaintiff: Baldwin County, Alabama, City of Demopolis, Alabama, City of Marion, Alabama and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00393
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?