Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 64
USA v. Andrew Swager We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-30212
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW THOMAS SWAGER
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Frank Bellospirito v. Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv01855
Plaintiff: Frank Bellospirito
Defendant: Department of Justice, Andrew Thomas Pribe, Bruce R Ellisen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Thomas v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05233
Defendant: McLane Company, Inc., eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees and others
Plaintiff: Andrew Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earnest #056363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv05690
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Tony Colon and others
Plaintiff: Gregory Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Andrew Swager We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-30198
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW THOMAS SWAGER
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Horace Bell v. E. Borla
as 19-16608
Respondent / Appellee: E. J. BORLA
Petitioner / Appellant: HORACE ANDREW BELL, AKA Horace Andrew Thomas
Earnest #56363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv04226
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff: Gregory Lewis Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neuendorf #147980 v. Greggs et al
as 2:2017cv04036
Plaintiff: John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Defendant: Unknown Greggs, Unknown Jones, Andrew Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claude Thomas, III v. Mark Nooth
as 16-36090
Petitioner - Appellant: CLAUDE ANDREW THOMAS, III
Respondent - Appellee: MARK NOOTH
Orozco #260141 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02026
Plaintiff: Luis Felipe Orozco
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?