Cases 11 - 20 of 6,317
Bowen v. Monsanto Co.
as 2:2024at00710
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowen
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brady v. Cenlar, FSB et al
as 6:2024cv00885
Defendant:
Cenlar, FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., Quality Loan Service Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Scott L. Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Irby v. Morner, et al.
as 24-2908
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant:
JACK MORNER, Superintendent of Prison, KEVIN BOWEN, Administrator Mission Housing, Chair of Mission Housing Department of Corrections and RONALD MEYERS, Custody Supervisor of IMU Unit C.U.S.
Bowen v. United States of America
as 24-2359
Petitioner:
CLIVE PATRICK BOWEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hu
as 24-2136
Defendant:
BOWEN HU and Hukeer
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Walker v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WALKER, as Guardian of an incapacitated adult on behalf of Issac Contreras
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, AARON BOWEN, UNKNOWN BOWEN, husband and wife and others
Pierre v. Garland, et al.
as 24-1323
Petitioner:
ANTONIO EDIOR PIERRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and M. BOWEN, Warden
Bowen et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
William Bowen and Pamala Bowen
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Bowen v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05123
Plaintiff:
Stacy Bowen
Defendant:
Clark County, Grant Hagen, Austin Cloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
