Cases 11 - 20 of 2,591
Israel v. Carter, et al.
as 24-1974
Plaintiff:
AKIVA AVIKAIDA ISRAEL
Defendant:
RUBY CARTER, SHAWNTEL SNOW, DAWN SANTOS and others
Carter v. Lawrence et al
as 2:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Taneysha Carter
Defendant:
Drew Lawrence and Mesa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carter
Defendant:
Tommy Johnson, John Schell, Wendel Yoda and others
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wintrode v. Twin Falls County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Twin Falls County Jail, Twin Falls County Sheriff, Tom Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan v. Abe et al
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Chik Chan
Defendant:
Atsushi Abe, Alan Campbell, Susan K Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell v. Sean Carter
as 8:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell
Defendant:
Sean Carter, Robyn Fenty and Sean Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carter v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mueller v. Ackley, et al.
as 24-1270
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHARLES MUELLER
Defendant:
ZACK ACKLEY, Superintendent DRCI, CARTER, DRCI Health Services Manager, BEAMER and others
Startop SPV - Long Angle Investments LLC v. Startop Investments, LLC, et al.
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Startop SPV - Long Angle Investments LLC
Defendant:
Startop Investments, LLC, David Hardcastle, Andrew Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
