Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bronson Nunuha, Estate of et al v. Hawaii, State of et al
as 1:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Brandy Nunuha-Tachera , Davina Waialae and Z. L. S.
Defendant:
Hawaii, State of , Public Safety, Hawaii Department of , Jodie F. Maesaka-Hirata and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Taryn Christian v. USDC-HI
as 12-70238
:
In re: TARYN CHRISTIAN
Petitioner:
TARYN CHRISTIAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Real Party In Interest:
CLAYTON FRANK, Director, State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-17032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Kenneth Jelks v. Todd Thomas, et al
as 11-16950
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH JELKS
Respondent - Appellee:
TODD THOMAS, Warden, Saguaro Correctional Center and CLAYTON FRANK, Dir., Dept. of Public Safety
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tunoa v. Thomas et al
as 2:2011cv01494
Plaintiff:
Emanuelu Tavita Tunoa
Defendant:
Todd Thomas, Benjamin Griego, Jody Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-16669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Kealoha v. Frank et al
as 1:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Kealoha
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata and John and Jane Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade Itagaki v. Clayton Frank, et al
as 11-15750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE T. ITAGAKI
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAYTON FRANK and STATE OF HAWAII
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
