Cases 11 - 20 of 177
James Snyder v. Al Ramirez, et al
as 23-35057
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES SNYDER
Respondent / Appellee:
AL RAMIREZ, Warden, CARLIN, Warden and BOB FERGUSON, AG
Carlin v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08727
Plaintiff:
Sean Carlin
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. Rentels et al
as 3:2022cv04525
Plaintiff:
Clyde Armstrong
Defendant:
Mark Rentels, Predo Rodrgous, Mark Rodrgous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ericsson v. Anderson, et al.
as 3:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Gunnar Bjorn Ericsson
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Amy B Anderson and Warden Terema D Carlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Cauley et al
as 3:2022cv03174
Plaintiff:
Cory A. Horton, Sr.
Defendant:
Brian Cauley, David Chiu, Dena Narbaitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Warburton v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv09884
Plaintiff:
William Warburton
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Aetna Life Insurance Company, Holthouse Carlin & Van Trigt LLP Welfare Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hagos v. Munoz et al
as 2:2021cv01640
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Eric Munoz, Jonathan Cruz, Michael Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andreas Knuttel et al v. Omaze, Inc.
as 2:2021cv09034
Petitioner:
andreas knuttel, matthew juranek and Adriana Carlin
Respondent:
Omaze, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Bosse v. Randy Blades, et al
as 21-35904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EARL BOSSE
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden, SICI, CARLIN, ICIO Warden, MCKAY and others
Durette v. Carlin
as 3:2021cv00369
Petitioner:
Timothy C Durette
Respondent:
Tenema Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
