Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Williams, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, BOP Warden of FDC Honolulu and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
David Verden Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Williams v. Martel
as 2:2018cv02224
Respondent:
Michael Martel
Petitioner:
David Earl Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maria Milagros Rosal v. David A Williams et al
as 5:2018cv00296
Defendant:
All Unnamed, Does, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Milagros Rosal
Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
as 2:2017cv02095
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Plaintiff:
David Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Williams v. L. Marshall
as 17-35575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DEAN MARSHALL
Williams v. Snohomish County Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
David L Williams
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections, Snohomish County Superior Court and Snohomish County Public Defenders Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv02403
Plaintiff:
David Earl Williams
Defendant:
Andre Williams, M. Davis, R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv00158
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Verden Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Arresting Sheriff et al
as 3:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
David Lyn Williams
Defendant:
Arresting Sheriff, GBDF Sheriff's Personnel, GBDF Sheriff's Watch Commander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. People of the State of California
as 3:2015cv02907
Petitioner:
David Lyn Williams
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
