Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 134
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Tohono O'odham Nation et al v. United States Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff: Tohono O'odham Nation, San Carlos Apache Tribe, Archaeology Southwest and others
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor: SunZia Transmission LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06601
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Gallatin Wildlife Association et al v. Erickson et al
as 9:2023cv00154
Plaintiff: Gallatin Wildlife Association, Native Ecosystems Council and Wildearth Guardians
Defendant: Mary Erickson, Randy Moore, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Western Watersheds Project v. Haaland et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02009
Petitioner: Western Watersheds Project
Respondent: Deb Haaland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Colvin & Son, LLC et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 3:2023cv00505
Plaintiff: Colvin & Son, LLC and Stone Cabin Ranch, LLC
Defendant: Deb Haaland, in her official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Tracy Stone-Manning in her official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, Jon Raby in his official capacity as the Nevada State Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Corrales Jr. v. Dutschke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01876
Plaintiff: Manuel Corrales Jr.
Defendant: Amy Dutschke, Deb Haaland and Bryan Newland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35587
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Sanchez v. Captain Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff: Darryl D. Sanchez
Defendant: Captain Davis, Lenora Nioce, Susan Messerly and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35569
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?