Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 352
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Hilary Cooley, et al
as 23-35436
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellant: HILARY COOLEY, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and DEB HAALAND, Secretary, Department of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO
Leavell v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff: Gary Leavell
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Stephen G Tryon, M Camille Calimli Touton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Opdahl et al v. United States Department of the Interior
as 3:2023cv05329
Plaintiff: JOANNE M OPDAHL, SABINA SAIB, HANNAH SAIB and others
Defendant: National Parks Service, United States Department of the Interior and National Park Service
Defendant / Appellant: Department of Interior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Orutsararmiut Native Council et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff: Orutsararmiut Native Council, Tuluksak Native Community and Organized Village of Kwethluk
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant: Donlin Gold LLC
Petitioner: Calista Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Green v. United States District Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2023cv00030
Petitioner: Jeremiah Chalwain Green
Respondent: United States District Court, United States Government and United States Department of Interior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemongas Enterprises, Inc., et al v. The City of Bakersfield, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00404
Plaintiff: Randeep S. Dhillon and Lemongas Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: The City of Bakersfield, The City of Bakersfield Police Department and The U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner: ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant: North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae: Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Jamul Action Committee v. Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02148
Plaintiff: Jamul Action Committee
Defendant: Department of Interior, Office of Indian Gaming and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Save the Yellowstone Grizzly v. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: Save the Yellowstone Grizzly
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Fort Belknap Indian Community v. The United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00103
Plaintiff: Fort Belknap Indian Community
Defendant: The United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?