Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Charles Kinney v. Philip Gutierrez, et al
as 16-56735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILIP GUTIERREZ, MICHELE CLARK, DAVID MARCUS and others
Charles Kinney v. Philip Gutierrez, et al
as 16-56320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILIP GUTIERREZ, MICHELE CLARK, DAVID MARCUS and others
Merlina v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00154
Defendant:
B. Carter, Christine Coleman, C. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Merlina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.D.L. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv04789
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Deputy Defendants Does and The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
D. D. L., Susan Lopez and Dominique Richardson
Steven Le'Roy Jackson v. M. Jesic et al
as 2:2014cv04262
Defendant:
Defendant Doe 1, Defendant Doe 1, Judith Greenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Le'Roy Jackson
E.V. v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv03087
Defendant:
City of Lynwood, County of Los Angeles, Deputy Defendants Does and others
Plaintiff:
E. V.
TOSCANO et al v. City Of Fresno et al
as 1:2013at00860
Plaintiff:
Angel Keith Toscano, Jr. and Cole Toscano
Defendant:
City Of Fresno, Jerry Dyer, DOES 1 - 50, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Isaac Garza v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv02938
Defendant:
Lee Baca, County of Los Angeles, Defendant Doe Deputies and LASD Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Isaac Garza
Peterson v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Patricia Peterson
Defendant:
Recontrust Company, N.A. , Bank of America and Defendant Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maui Pineapple Company Ltd. v. Leo A. Daly Company et al
as 1:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Maui Pineapple Company Ltd.
Defendant:
Leo A. Daly Company, Leo A. Daly Company and Defendant Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
