Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Alain Dunn v. Jim's Towing Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01055
Plaintiff:
Alain Dunn
Defendant:
Jim's Towing Services, Inc. and Jon Ewert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunn v. Jim's Towing Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015at00572
Plaintiff:
Alain Dunn
Defendant:
Jim's Towing Services, Inc. and Jon Ewert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
White v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv05019
Plaintiff:
Donald White , Jr
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections, Washington State Penitentiary, Stephen Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Efren Acosta et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05682
Plaintiff:
Efren Acosta, Peter Acosta, Rene Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Foley et al v. Morrone et al
as 2:2013cv01639
Defendant:
Clark County, Clark County Clerk, Michael Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
EAF, Michael Foley, MAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Ewert v. Ebay, Inc.
as 12-17251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EWERT, on behalf of himself and for the Benefit of all with Common General Interest, any Persons Injured, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EBAY, INC.
Michael Ewert, et al v. Ebay, Inc.
as 10-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL EWERT, on behalf of himself and for the Benefit of all with Common General Interest, any Persons Injured, and all others similarly situated and THE MISSING LINK, INC.
Defendant - Petitioner:
EBAY, INC.
Ewert v. State of Washington
as 2:2010cv05006
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Ewert
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ewert v. eBay, Inc.
as 5:2007cv02198
Plaintiff:
Michael Ewert, Michael Ewert, Michael Ewert and others
Defendant:
eBay, Inc., eBay, Inc. and eBay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
