Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Ramos et al v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
as 3:2019cv02757
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Vallejo Medrano, Floricel Liborio Ramos, Maria de Jesus Medina Ramirez and others
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xiong v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
as 2:2019cv00508
Plaintiff:
Mai Katy Xiong
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luis Heredia v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09394
Plaintiff:
Luis Heredia
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc., G4S Compliance & Investigations, Inc., G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jasone Watkins v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08739
Plaintiff:
Jasone Watkins
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc., DOES Does 1 through 20, inclusive, G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Serrano v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
as 5:2018cv05753
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. and Wackenhut Corporation
Plaintiff:
Roberta Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joanel T. Lubin v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 2:2017cv03772
Defendant:
DOES and G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joanel T. Lubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Shibata v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
as 2:2017cv01208
Plaintiff:
Tomo Shibata
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.