Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Gillen-Townsley v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv00889
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kathleen Gillen-Townsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Robin Starr v. USA
as 18-15883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN GILLEN STARR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott Gillen, et al v. Town of Hayden, et al
as 17-16616
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT GILLEN, husband and VERONICA GILLEN, wife
Defendant - Appellant:
TOWN OF HAYDEN, a political subdivision, CHARLES VEGA and ESTATE OF MICHAEL HADDAD
Defendant:
W. WHITE, M. ENGWIS and M. BOWLING
Scott Gillen, et al v. Town of Hayden, et al
as 17-16617
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT GILLEN, husband and VERONICA GILLEN, wife
Defendant:
TOWN OF HAYDEN, a political subdivision, CHARLES VEGA and ESTATE OF MICHAEL HADDAD
Defendant - Appellant:
W. WHITE, M. ENGWIS and M. BOWLING
Robin Starr v. USA
as 17-15914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN GILLEN STARR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anshu Bharat Pathak v. Sunil Bhasin et al
as 5:2017cv00521
Defendant:
Allied Global Care, Allied Global Care, Inc., Sunil Bhasin and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Bharat Pathak
Jessica Shell, et al v. Forget Me Not Animal Shelter, et al
as 17-35220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA SHELL and PHILIP SHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FORGET ME NOT ANIMAL SHELTER and KIM GILLEN
Defendant:
FERRY COUNTY, FERRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, PETE WARNER and others
Robin Starr v. United States
as 2:2017cv00206
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Robin Gillen Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2016cv03033
Petitioner:
Robin Gillen Starr
Respondent:
CDCR, BOP and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starr v. United States et al
as 2:2016cv01829
Plaintiff:
Robin Gillen Starr
Defendant:
United States and David Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
