Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Ronald Jones et al v. Michael Keitz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01725
Plaintiff: Ronald Jones , John Cayanne and Jim Glasscock
Defendant: Michael Keitz, John Anderson, Robert Biehm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Keitz et al
as 1:2016at00944
Plaintiff: Ronald Jones , John Cayanne and Jim Glasscock
Defendant: Michael Keitz, John Anderson, Robert Biehm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasscock v. Taylor
as 2:2014cv00016
Petitioner: Charles Franklin Glasscock
503) 326-5524 (fax: Steven T. Wax
Respondent: Jeri Taylor
503) 947-4794 (fax: Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerdon v. 5th District Court et al
as 1:2013cv00342
Plaintiff: James Alan Gerdon
Defendant: 5th District Court, Kristina Glasscock, Sharie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasscock v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01253
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Roxanna F. Glasscock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Maidhof et al v. Celaya et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv04971
Plaintiff: Callie Maidhof , Zachary Solomon Miller , Brian Glasscock and others
Defendant: Mitchell Celaya , Harry Legrande , Marc Decoulode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Gleason v. Glasscock, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02030
Defendant: Anne Glasscock and The California Horse Racing Board
Plaintiff: Patrick Gleason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gleason v. Glasscock et al
as 2:2010at01104
Defendant: Anne Glasscock and The California Horse Racing Board
Plaintiff: Patrick Gleason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?