Cases 11 - 20 of 1,549
People of the State of California v. Express Scripts, Inc., et al.
as 24-1972
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through Los Angeles County Counsel Dawyn R. Harrison
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., EXPRESS SCRIPTS ADMINISTRATORS, LLC, ESI MAIL PHARMACY SERVICE, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Tashae Davis
Defendant:
Tiffany Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander
Harrison v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Marty Harrison
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Everett Paul Hailey v. Brett Christian Harrison et al
as 2:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Everett Paul Hailey
Defendant:
Brett Christian Harrison and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Michael Harrison v. 3K Autobody and Repair et al
as 8:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRISON
Defendant:
3K AUTOBODY & REPAIR, THOMAS NGUYEN and 3K Autobody and Repair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Harris et al v. Senior Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Harrison, Dianne Sullivan and Virginia Cole
Defendant:
Senior Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
