Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Tyrell Erlebach v. Payette County Board of Commissioners, et al
as 22-35213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRELL CURTIS ERLEBACH
Defendant / Appellee:
PAYETTE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CHAD HUFF, Payette County Sheriff in his individual and official capacities, RAJ ENTERPRISES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, DBA Pinnacle Laboratories, DBA Pinnacle Laboratory Services, DBA Pinnacle Labs and others
Johnson v. Robertson et al
as 3:2020cv04803
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, L. L. Gutierrez, A. G. Maylin and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Joseph Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Johnson v. Andrew Saul
as 20-35128
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Nicholas v. State of Idaho
as 1:2020cv00054
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Petitioner:
Joseph Johnson Nicholas, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Kelly
as 2:2019cv01767
Petitioner:
Joseph Johnson
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2019cv05255
Defendant:
Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc., Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc. and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. KLS Martin L.P
as 4:2019cv03802
Defendant:
KLS Martin L.P
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05593
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson-Bey v. Lammey et al
as 3:2019cv03762
Defendant:
James M. Lammey and Thomas Leith
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson-Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
(PC) Johnson v. Blackmon et al
as 2:2019cv01103
Defendant:
Struble, Blackmon, Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
