Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Mickle v. Brown, et al
as 3:1992cv02951
Plaintiff:
Denny Mickle
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Defendant:
Jill Brown
3rd_party_defendant:
Robert L. Ayers
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers and Robert K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Carpenter v. Brown, et al
as 3:2000cv03706
Petitioner:
David J. Carpenter
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Respondent:
Jill Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Brown, et al
as 3:1998cv02444
Petitioner:
David J. Carpenter
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Respondent:
Jill Brown
3rd_party_defendant:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Thomas v. Brown, et al
as 3:1993cv00616
Plaintiff:
Ralph I. Thomas
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Defendant:
Jill Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Roy Nakashima v. Jill Brown, et al
as 09-15875
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY HIROSHI NAKASHIMA
Respondent - Appellee:
JILL BROWN, Warden and CAROL DALY
Johnson v. Brown, et al
as 3:1995cv00305
Plaintiff:
Laverne Johnson
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Defendant:
Jill Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Donald DeBose, Jr. v. M. Bell, et al
as 09-15089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD R. DEBOSE, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BELL, C. SIMON, J. BAKER and others
William Bird v. Jill Brown
as 08-16165
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. BIRD
Respondent - Appellee:
JILL BROWN
Noel Valdivia, Sr. v. Jill Brown, et al
as 08-15650
Petitioner - Appellee:
NOEL VALDIVIA, Sr.
Respondent - Appellant:
JILL BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.