Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Arina Plotnikova
as 2:2021cv01743
Defendant:
Arina Plotnikova, Arina Plotnikova an individual also known as Gloriy Redi doing business as Plotnikovas Store and Gloriy Redi
Plaintiff:
Lamps Plus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lampe v. Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention et al
as 2:2020cv01185
Plaintiff:
Corey M Lampe, Sr
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Indeterminate Sentence Review Board/Community Custody Board, Department of Corrections and Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph J. Avila, Sr. v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02705
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, Lampe Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph J. Avila, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Palafox et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Rafael Palafox and Veronica Ordorica
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Lampe Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miholich v. The Lampe Company, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00276
Defendant:
The Lampe Company, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Kyle Miholich
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Armstrong v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2019cv01275
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Armstrong
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Lampe Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chemical Bank v. Lampe et al.
as 6:2019cv00852
Defendant:
Sandra L. Lampe and Jennifer E. Lampe
Plaintiff:
Chemical Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
