Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Henderson v. VIP Taxi LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Henderson, Jr.
Defendant:
VIP Taxi LLC, Sherri Lynn Colson, Maricopa County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Arpaio
as 2:2016cv01224
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Henderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Lee Henderson v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2016cv02003
Respondent:
Jeffery Beard and Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Henderson, Sr.
Henderson #280969 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00592
Petitioner:
Tommie Lee Henderson, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson #280969 v. Maricopa, County of
as 2:2015cv00486
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Henderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson #280969 v. Maricopa, County of
as 2:2014cv02442
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of and John Ditsworth
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Henderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Henderson v. Kevin Chappell
as 14-73227
Petitioner:
MARCUS LEE HENDERSON
Respondent:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden
Standard Insurance Company v. Asuncion et al
as 2:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Standard Insurance Company
Defendant:
Paula Asuncion, Donna Marie Whitaker, Thomas A. Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
USA v. Lee Henderson
as 13-50374
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE HENDERSON, AKA B Down, AKA Bdawn, AKA Bee Dog Henderson, AKA Lee Arthur Henderson, AKA Lee Augry Henderson, AKA Lee Autry Henderson, AKA L Bdog, AKA Lee-Dog
Curtis Henderson, Sr. v. California Department of Corr, et al
as 13-15725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, J. ESPINOZA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
