Cases 11 - 20 of 722
De Los Santos v. Avner & Kaufman LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02679
Defendant:
Brycen Bradfield, Ronald McCollum, Joyce Arce and others
Plaintiff:
Marfelix De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lorie Atwater v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv10546
Plaintiff:
LORIE ATWATER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy Brian Hudson, Deputy Ely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hardcourt et al
as 2:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
Keiton Smith
Defendant:
Maxwell Hardcourt, C. Castiglioni and NDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copello v. Hunterz Hub, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02612
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Copello
Defendant:
Hunterz Hub, LLC and McKenzie Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Copello v. Hunterz Hub, LLC et al
as 2:2023at01147
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Copello
Defendant:
Hunterz Hub, LLC and McKenzie Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Graham v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 3:2023cv04865
Plaintiff:
Maxwell A Graham
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Okhandiar et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Krishna Okhandiar and Remilia Corporation LLC
Defendant:
Henry Smith, Maxwell Roux and John Duff, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
McGowan v. NetApp, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
Neil McGowan
Defendant:
NetApp, Inc., Henri Richard, Elizabeth O'Callahan and others
Ray A. Maxwell v. Warden
as 2:2023cv04546
Petitioner:
Ray A Maxwell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kenneth James Maxwell Jr. v. Martin E. Estrada
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin E. Estrada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
