Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
COMPUGROUP MEDICAL INC. v. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 5:2022mc80068
Plaintiff:
COMPUGROUP MEDICAL INC.
Defendant:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Synergy Hematology-Oncology Medical Associates, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
Synergy Hematology-Oncology Medical Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
American Academy Of Emergency Medicine Physician Group, Inc. v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
American Academy Of Emergency Medicine Physician Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation and Envision Physician Services LLC
Amicus Curiae:
American College Of Emergency Physicians and California Medical Association
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv01990
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Summer Stephan
Plaintiff:
Neighborhood Market Association, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Lung Association, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Creation of a Remedy - Declaration of Rights
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Helen N. Robbins-Meyer and County of San Diego
Plaintiff:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Public Health Law Center, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, American Lung Association and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Fresenius Medical Care Orange County, LLC et al v. Xavier Becerra et al
as 8:2019cv02130
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Sonia Angell, Shelley Rouillard and others
Plaintiff:
Fresenius Medical Care Orange County, LLC, U.S. Renal Care, Inc., DaVita Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
California State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and California Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Armin Abazari et al v. United States Department of Education et al
as 8:2019cv01290
Defendant:
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Navient Solutions, LLC,, American Podiatric Medical Association and others
Plaintiff:
Armin Abazari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
