Cases 11 - 20 of 38
USA v. Michael Spitzauer
as 20-35840
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PETER SPITZAUER, AKA Michael Peter Scott Spitzauer McCune
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spitzauer v. USA
as 4:2019cv05229
Petitioner:
Michael Peter Spitzauer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peters et al v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2019cv00873
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Arthur Wallin, Snohomish County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Michael Peters, Jayni Peters, Estate of Nickolas Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spitzauer v. USA
as 4:2019cv05132
Petitioner:
Michael Peter Spitzauer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Peter Violante v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv05309
Defendant:
Oroville Ford, Inc., Ford Motor Company and Oroville Ford, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Oroville Ford Lincoln Mercury
Plaintiff:
Michael Peter Violante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Violante v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01565
Defendant:
Oroville Ford, Inc., Ford Motor Company and Oroville Ford, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Oroville Ford Lincoln Mercury
Plaintiff:
Michael Peter Violante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dave Michael Peters v. Roger Steffens et al
as 2:2018cv02757
Plaintiff:
Dave Michael Peters
Defendant:
Roger Steffens, Tantor Media, Incorporated and W.W. Norton and Company
Peters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2017cv04367
Plaintiff:
Michael Peters
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
