Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Quintanilla-Cortez v. Garland
as 23-1057
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO QUINTANILLA-CORTEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan Quintanilla Vasquez, et al v. Libre by Nexus, Inc.
as 23-15278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, GABRIELA JAMILETH PERDOMO ORTIZ, VICTOR HUGO CATALAN MOLINA and others
Appellant:
MICHAEL DONOVAN, RICHARD MOORE and EVAN AJIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Flores Quintanilla v. Garland
as 23-74
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR FLORES QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vasquez-Quintanilla, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1998
Petitioner:
RHINA ZULEIMA VASQUEZ-QUINTANILLA and DAVID ANTONIO PORTILLO-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pacas-Quintanilla v. Garland
as 22-1874
Petitioner:
MAURICIO RAFAEL PACAS-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mitchell v. Quintanilla et al
as 2:2022cv01827
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Mitchell
Defendant:
Officer O. Quintanilla, Sgt. Navarrete, SC/O Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margarito T. Lopez et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv07534
Plaintiff:
Margarito T. Lopez, Sonia Torres, Keni Lopez and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Jose Zavala, Julio Quintanilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quintanilla v. The Pacific Star Hotel et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Eli Charfauros Quintanilla
Defendant:
The Pacific Star Hotel and Attorney Jay Arriolla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
