Cases 11 - 20 of 27
McVay v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv05056
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony McVay
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, R Long and R Lathim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Green, et al., v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv01489
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Green , Floyd Rodgers, Jr. , Dixie Ross and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carlos Pasos v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS PASOS
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, J. W. HAVILAND, Warden, V. SINGH, Associate Warden and others
Cofield v. Swarthout et al
as 2:2012cv02343
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Cofield
Defendant:
G. Swarthout, R Long, A Valencia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gyles Long v. King County, et al
as 12-35162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GYLES R. LONG
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY, CHRISTINE OH and KAREN GRAHAM
Long v. King County et al
as 2:2011cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gyles R Long
Defendant:
King County , Christine Oh and Karen Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pasos v. Cates et al
as 2:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pasos
Defendant:
Mathew Cates, J.W. Haviland, V. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnathan Williams, et al v. California Department of Corre, et al
as 09-16519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN S. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
AMAESHI NWOZUZU
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION & REHABILITATION, GOMEZ, ALAMEIDA and others
Armentero v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv01716
Plaintiff:
Luis Lorenzo Armentero
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, J. Ingrao, J Murray Fries and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walton v. Murry et al
as 2:2008cv01347
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Walton
Defendant:
C Murry, Ringler, L. Noble and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
