Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Martinez v. Hacker-Agnew et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00731
Petitioner: Raul Rene Martinez
Respondent: Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez-Encinas v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2016cv00572
Petitioner: Rene Martinez-Encinas
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shirley Reynolds et al v. Pfizer Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01907
Plaintiff: Sheli Allen, Cathie Anderson, Indir Balraj and others
Defendant: John Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Hugo Martinez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72966
Petitioner: HUGO RENE MARTINEZ, HUGO RENE MARTINEZ-QUINONEZ and GLENDY MARICELA MARTINEZ
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Darrell Parks v. Wren, et al
as 13-55905
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee: WREN, Mailroom Supervisor, TOM BRODY, RENE GALAZ and others
Rene Martinez-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71572
Petitioner: RENE MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rene Martinez-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-74026
Petitioner: RENE MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Leonard Isenberg v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
as 2:2012cv09721
Plaintiff: Leonard Isenberg
Defendant: Los Angeles Unified School District, Janet Seary, Rene Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darrell Parks v. Wren et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01353
Defendant: All Mailroom Staffs, Tom Brody, Stephen Casey and others
Plaintiff: Darrell Parks
Martinez-Encinas v. USA
as 4:2012cv00186
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Rene Martinez-Encinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?