Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Franklin v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2017cv02277
Plaintiff:
Mike Franklin
Defendant:
County of Placer, Ronald Scott Owens, Maria Leftwich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Panda Express, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02105
Defendant:
Panda Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Scott v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cleveland v. Owens
as 2:2014cv01528
Petitioner:
Kevin Arther Cleveland
Respondent:
Ronald Scott Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00623
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Beatty v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01092
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott Beatty
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rosol v. USA
as 3:2013cv00751
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald Scott Rosol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ruvalcaba et al v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00658
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruvalcaba , Julian Valdez , Ruben Ruvalcaba and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc. , Consolidated Concepts , Dustin Hill Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bay Area Painters & Tapers Pension Trust Fund et al v. New Providence Interiors et al
as 3:2010cv02405
Plaintiff:
Bay Area Painters & Tapers Pension Trust Fund , Les Proteau , Charles Del Monte and others
Defendant:
New Providence Interiors and Ronald Scott Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Avista Corporation Inc. v. Sanders County, et al
as 09-35722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVISTA CORPORATION INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDERS COUNTY, DORRIEN H WOLFE, DIANE LARSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
