Cases 11 - 20 of 556
Loggin v. In Ram Parking Lots
as 24-4148
Defendant:
IN RAM PARKING LOTS, Main Roof Pool at 3d4th site
Plaintiff:
LUIS LOGGIN
Luis Loggin v. In Ram Parking Lots
as 2:2024cv05271
Defendant:
In Ram Parking Lots
Plaintiff:
Luis Loggin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Hollywood Sikh Temple et al
as 2:2024cv05155
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Old Navy, Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park, Wilder Institute Calgary Zoo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillhunt v. Montana Kalispell et al
as 2:2024cv05083
Defendant:
Hollister, California, Queen of the Valley Medical Center, Aitch and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PC) Mackey v. Rudd, et al.
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Terry Mackey
Defendant:
K. Ram, Rudd, J Dewoody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Daniel Frank et al v. Yardi Systems Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frank and Lakshmi Nagireddi
Defendant:
Yardi Systems, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Lincoln Property Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Dodge Ram 2008, VIN #1D7HA18K28J204709
as 4:2024mc00015
Not Yet Classified:
Dodge Ram 2008, VIN #1D7HA18K28J204709
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
