Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Erie County Employees' Retirement System v. Cutera, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02560
Plaintiff:
Erie County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Cutera, Inc., David H. Mowry, Rohan Seth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Burton v. Rohan et al
as 2:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Daymeyan Burton
Defendant:
C/O Rohan, William Hutchings, J. Scally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Will Sitton v. LVMPD, et al
as 21-17084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILL SITTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF LAMBARDO, LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL and others
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Thomsons Logistics Inc, et al.
as 1:2021cv00635
Defendant:
Thomsons Logistics Inc and Rohan Panakkal
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BEA Investment Properties, LLC v. Pare et al
as 4:2020cv08753
Defendant:
Alisha Pare and Rohan P. Shepherd
Plaintiff:
BEA Investment Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
