Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01846
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Jordan O'Hara et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03709
Defendant:
Emerdata Limited, Aleksandr Kogan, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bell, Brent Collins, Ann Kowaleski and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jordan O'Hara et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00571
Defendant:
Stephen K. Bannon, Cambridge Analytica, LLC, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Collins, Olivia Johnston and Jordan O'Hara
Glenn v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Respondent:
Stephen K. Bushong and State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Melree Larea Glenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Van Hagen et al
as 3:2016cv00666
Defendant:
Stephen K. Bushong, Jean K. Maurer, Multnomah County and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weinstone v. Pierce County Prosecutor
as 3:2015cv05255
Plaintiff:
Stephen K Weinstone
Defendant:
Pierce County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00134
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00575
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis v. Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons et al
as 2:2013cv01512
Plaintiff:
Stephen K Lewis
Defendant:
Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons and King County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Stefan Wilson
as 13-10091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson, AKA Steven K. Wilson
Movant - Appellant:
RICHARD A. GRAY, Jr., GRAY INVESTMENT PARTNERS and CUMBERLAND HILL CAPITAL FUND, LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
