Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Svetlana Narbaeva v. Fremont Hopsital / UHS Inc.
as 23-15222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SVETLANA NARBAEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
FREMONT HOPSITAL / UHS INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Svetlana Narbaeva v. Fremont Hopsital / UHS Inc.
as 22-15401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SVETLANA NARBAEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
FREMONT HOPSITAL / UHS INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Antonio Zayas, et al v. State Farm Insurance, et al
as 22-15153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO ZAYAS and SVETLANA NARBAEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM INSURANCE and NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE
Mills Potoczak and Co. v. Nautilus Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Mills Potoczak and Co.
Defendant:
Landmark American Insurance Company, Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Konstantin Shechter and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Tsvetkov v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv01394
Plaintiff:
Svetlana O. Tsvetkov
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Medina et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021at00583
Plaintiff:
Bradley Medina and Svetlana Krivencheva
Defendant:
United States of America and Courtney L. Mapes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Medina et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00844
Plaintiff:
Bradley Medina and Svetlana Krivencheva
Defendant:
Courtney L. Mapes, M.D. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
